价值链工人相关行动和资源

**(AR 29 and AR 30 amended)*

• The actions taken by the undertaking differ depending on its connection to the impact (causation, contribution, direct linkage) and how it has identified the actions as appropriate for addressing material impacts. This DR also applies to key actions to provide, cooperate in, or enable remediation in cases of actual negative impacts. Key actions to prevent, mitigate or remediate impacts include the use of different types of leverage or collective actions taken through multi-stakeholder or industry initiatives.

**(11

(c) amended)*

• The undertaking shall present its actions in a way that allows an understanding of the connections that exist between different topics, in accordance with Chapters 3.3 and 9.1 of ESRS 1 General Requirements. This applies to measures taken to mitigate negative impacts on its workers in the value chain that arise from the transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy. For example, innovation and restructuring can lead to mine closures or increased mining of minerals needed for the transition to a sustainable economy. Conversely, positive impacts may arise from initiatives such as updating purchasing practices or training supply chain workers. Other examples include current and/or expected external developments that influence dependencies that are sources of just transition risks.

**(New)*

• The human rights incidents in scope for this disclosure are those that relate to not respecting internationally recognised human rights as defined in CSRD Art. 29b (2)

(b) (iii). These incidents are understood as the substantiated instances of:

(a) judicial and non-judicial proceedings that have been initiated (such as cases before domestic courts and tribunals, mediation, complaints filed with the National Contact Points for OECD Multinational Enterprises); and/or

(b) incidents registered by the undertaking, including those it identified through its internal processes.

**(New)*

• When applying the filter of information materiality (paragraph 23 of ESRS 1 General Requirements) to the information about incidents referred to under paragraph 18, the undertaking's assessment is primarily based on the severity of the impacts on its workers in the value chain.

**(New)*

• The undertaking is not expected to disclose a list of each human rights incident, and may aggregate the information provided, such as by relevant types of incidents and/or workers in the value chain affected.

**(New)*

• If the undertaking considers that changes in human rights incidents are relevant for understanding the effectiveness and availability of channels to raise concerns or needs, including grievance mechanisms, it may cross-reference paragraph 18 and paragraph

14. **(New)*

• The way the undertaking has addressed or is addressing human rights incidents may be cross-referenced to information disclosed in accordance with paragraph

17. > ⁴ This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory and additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts, as set out by indicator #10 in Table I of Annex I, by indicator #14 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Violations of the UNGPs and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises” and “Number of identified cases of severe human rights issues and incidents”), and the information needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator ‘Number of benchmark constituents subject to social violations (absolute number and relative divided by all benchmark constituents), as referred to in international treaties and conventions, United Nations principles and, where applicable, national law’ in Section 1 and 2 of Annex II.